Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3

Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '22 at 19:40
Run Duration	312 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 2,104 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 89.9 2-Core 169 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 528 51% 418 Pts	64-Core 818 51% 818 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Gigabyte(1458 405B) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Lighting 187 Reflection 178 Parallax 188 153% 184 fps	MRender 190 Gravity 145 Splatting 121 121% 152 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asgard AN512NVMe-M.2/80 512GB 651 User benchmarks, average bench 175% 294GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1111H0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1286 308 593 624 332 251 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	140% Outstanding	Read 1,294 Write 1,311 Mixed 870 SusWrite 566 226% 1010 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 93.4 4K Mixed 18.4 115% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 543 DQ Write 378 DQ Mixed 423 326% 448 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 245%
NE-1TB 1TB 2,390 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 798GB free Firmware: U0204A0L SusWrite @10s intervals: 1330 1333 1397 1373 1341 1353 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Read 1,453 Write 1,308 Mixed 920 SusWrite 1,354 283% 1,259 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 99.9 4K Mixed 18.3 121% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 567 DQ Write 417 DQ Mixed 410 328% 464 MB/s
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 270%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: ACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 194 193 195 195 195 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 156 Mixed 42.8 SusWrite 194 101% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$79 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 499GB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 39 39 42 41 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 39.6 Write 43.1 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 38.4 26% 35.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.5 168% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 75%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB 3,723 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 169GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 112 112 109 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 93.7 Write 95.6 Mixed 66 SusWrite 110 125% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 1.1 282% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 95%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB 3,723 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 7TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 198 194 185 193 198 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 193 Write 198 Mixed 108 SusWrite 194 233% 173 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.5 250% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 95%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 248GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 84GB free, PID 00ed Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 57 49 55 51 53 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 147 Write 64.3 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 52.8 81% 71.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.2 88% 3 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 37%
Netac OnIyDisk 128GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 40GB free, PID 1081 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 42 36 42 34 41 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.9% Poor	Read 81.8 Write 14.2 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 38.8 42% 38.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.8 118% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB 249 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 46.2 MC Write 42.4 MC Mixed 44.4 127% 44.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 12.1 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X79-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 - $380

CPU
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	435x
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	202x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	53x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	47x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	53x
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	23x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	22x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 67%, 1,867 samples	35x
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 2,734 samples	28x
F3 DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 65%, 473 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $576

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16