MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 167%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B58
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '22 at 00:21
Run Duration374 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 149
2-Core 251
94% 165 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 954
92% 755 Pts
64-Core 1,200
74% 1,200 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499
MSI(1462 5052) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
168% Outstanding
Lighting 257
Reflection 230
Parallax 4.7
209% 164 fps
MRender 248
Gravity 155
Splatting 126
138% 176 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 168%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1106 561 402 381 435 369 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 2,021
Write 1,680
Mixed 708
SusWrite 542
275% 1,238 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 71.7
233% 86.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,242
DQ Write 940
DQ Mixed 920
734% 1,034 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 235%
Great: 302%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
62GB free
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 184 185 196 210 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 380
Write 252
Mixed 290
SusWrite 193
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 43.4
162% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 148
143% 226 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 91%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2318 1865 1332 1335 1333 1329 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 134%
Intel 730 Series 480GB-$230
179GB free
Firmware: L2010420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 480 479 480 478 478 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 417
Write 483
Mixed 345
SusWrite 479
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 41.3
162% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 316
240% 324 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
937GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 100 104 123 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 94.1
Write 100
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 112
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 87%
SMI USB disk 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.7 5.9 6.5 7 7.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
6.07% Terrible
Read 18.4
Write 5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6.6
9% 8.55 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.07%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.5
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 30.3
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 46.1
SC Mixed 31
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 103%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) Builds (Compare 2,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,006
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback