Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '17 at 00:38
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 71.7 2-Core 137 62% 99.9 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 222 30% 221 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 319GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16289 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 179 (B1) Unknown 99 99 13 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 59 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 31 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15061495745	68.2% Good	Read 367 Write 266 Mixed 153 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 35 4K Mixed 28.2 103% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 83.8 DQ Mixed 61.6 63% 104 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 209GB free Firmware: KC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 99 1224 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7907 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 10755577 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 22134 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6678 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 57 4850778145 (C2) HDA temperature 33 43 -140737488355295 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 43 31 1224 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -31748398232602 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3669874340 (F2) Unknown 100 253 768246679	56.6% Above average	Read 96.1 Write 101 Mixed 29.7 55% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.74 128% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 88%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 61GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 30.4 Mixed 24.9 36% 28 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.2 75% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 41%
Maxtor OneTouch III 80GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 17GB free, PID 7250 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 30 Write 29.9 Mixed 13.1 30% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.81 4K Mixed 0.3 40% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Transcend JM1333KLN-4G KHX1600C9D3/4GX Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.2% Average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 15.3 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 12.5 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	565x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $606

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16