PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 77.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus B85-PRO GAMER (all builds) |
Memory | 7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140620 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Apr 13 '22 at 19:09 |
Run Duration | 364 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
66.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 56RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 94 136 80 88 129 MB/s
|
77.2%
Very good
|
|||
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 169 172 173 170 173 MB/s
|
77.9%
Very good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
309GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 69 76 56 42 78 MB/s
|
||||
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
904GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
|
21.7%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD64 00AAVS-00G9B1 640GB
386GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 43 43 43 MB/s
|
21.9%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 227x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 203x |
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 151x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 156x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 141x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 94x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $927 |