Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Memory 78.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 248 82% 150 Pts	4-Core 491 8-Core 688 74% 589 Pts	64-Core 698 43% 698 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 91%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
240g SSD 240GB 183 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0311A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 315 39 7.6 9.1 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 418 Write 218 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 71.7 39% 179 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 8.4 4K Mixed 0.3 42% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 11.6 DQ Mixed 0.3 21% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 98%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 651GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 106 110 111 111 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 134 Write 133 Mixed 66.9 SusWrite 110 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 1x8GB 742 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.3% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 10.4 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 11.7 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 83.7 48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 25%

Raft

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	44x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	32x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	32x

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $185

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16