Asus H61M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-K (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140721
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	May 15 '22 at 22:29
Run Duration	246 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 94.5 1-Core 76.5 2-Core 155 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 225 30% 225 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.68% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.5 2% 2.03 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 2 Splatting 2 2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.68% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 67 50 51 52 50 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.2% Average	Read 217 Write 213 Mixed 79 SusWrite 78.9 33% 147 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 24.5 81% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 74.2 81% 137 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 91%
Seagate ST3400820AS 400GB 872 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 372GB free Firmware: 3.CHL SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 76 77 77 77 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 75.8 Write 41.9 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 76.1 44% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 43%
WDC WD10 EADS-11M2B1 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 931GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6 6 6 5.9 6.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.3% Very poor	Read 25.6 Write 19 Mixed 22 SusWrite 6 23% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 18%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 3TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6 6 6 5.9 6.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	9.62% Terrible	Read 28.3 Write 22.2 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 6 26% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.62% Great: 68%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 3.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6 6 6 5.9 6.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.66% Terrible	Read 28.4 Write 21.9 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 6 25% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.66% Great: 59%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 3TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.8% Terrible	Read 28.3 Write 22.2 Mixed 22.9 SusWrite 0 23% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.8% Great: 59%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 117GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.69% Terrible	Read 24.9 Write 21.7 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 4.2 23% 18 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 8.69% Great: 74%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 20.7 Write 20.4 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 4.2 22% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.6 152% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 74%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.9 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 22.9 Write 23.2 Mixed 23.6 SusWrite 3.8 24% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.7 114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 92%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 23.2 Write 22.4 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 4.2 23% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB 7,092 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 19.1 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.9 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 58.5 68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	332x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	266x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	188x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	441x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	147x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	112x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	65x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	50x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	49x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	48x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16