| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
22 months ago, 21 months ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190731 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 06 '22 at 02:25 |
| Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
| Run User | NZL-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84.6%
Excellent
|
83% 151 Pts
|
78% 630 Pts
|
60% 967 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2978) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51%
Above average
|
50% 68.5 fps
|
53% 64.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 236 218 215 211 212 MB/s
|
105%
Outstanding
|
82% 367 MB/s
|
173% 60 MB/s
|
269% 362 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 78.BAGM6.DFC0B 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.2%
Average
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
47% 85.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,016 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 872x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 717x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 545x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 458x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 427x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 406x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Excellent | Total price: $347 |