Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 176% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 172% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	357% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF (all builds)
Memory	53 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211113
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '22 at 08:11
Run Duration	332 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$265 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Memory 89.3 1-Core 137 2-Core 273 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 540 8-Core 1,105 97% 822 Pts	64-Core 1,132 70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$909 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	189% Outstanding	Lighting 273 Reflection 244 Parallax 302 222% 273 fps	MRender 316 Gravity 231 Splatting 168 187% 238 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 565GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1296 1391 1730 1749 1726 1717 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	357% Outstanding	Read 2,535 Write 2,127 Mixed 2,291 SusWrite 1,602 480% 2,139 MB/s	4K Read 77.2 4K Write 181 4K Mixed 74.8 308% 111 MB/s	DQ Read 1,664 DQ Write 1,262 DQ Mixed 1,352 1,041% 1,426 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 357% Great: 435%
Toshiba HDWF180 8TB 2,355 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 333GB free Firmware: GX0B SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 125 121 123 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Read 117 Write 129 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 122 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.9 212% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 104GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 200 Write 151 Mixed 81.9 SusWrite 100 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 87GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 117 117 116 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 118 Write 84.7 Mixed 68.9 SusWrite 116 71% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$38 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 151GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 134 134 136 137 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 115 Write 100 Mixed 69.9 SusWrite 134 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 208GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 202 201 203 204 201 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 202 Write 167 Mixed 88.7 SusWrite 200 120% 164 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 113%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 101GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 53 54 53 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Read 105 Write 91.6 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 53.3 98% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 74%
Fantom External HDD 8TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 180GB free, PID b565 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 72 79 75 77 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 48.7 Write 84.9 Mixed 54.6 SusWrite 76.8 95% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.5 184% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 55%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 165GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 52 53 53 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 98.4 Write 104 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 52.9 103% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 53%
FD Fantom 8TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 62 63 62 62 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58.5% Above average	Read 182 Write 161 Mixed 72 SusWrite 62.6 149% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.7 230% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 69%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 267GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 135 134 134 136 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 93.8 Write 105 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 134 135% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GB 2,431 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 26.3 83% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 24.7 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING WIFI-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	349x
Core i5-8600KIntel $139Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	125x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	68x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	73x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	57x
RTX 3070Nvidia $490Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	54x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	29x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $30Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	23x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $862

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16