Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	8.28% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 5370 APU R3 81 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Memory 46.8 1-Core 25 2-Core 47.3 27% 39.7 Pts	4-Core 65.4 8-Core 91.4 10% 78.4 Pts	64-Core 62.3 4% 62.3 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3 11,968 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 9830) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	1.83% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 2.8 2% 2.83 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.6 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.83% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
3 120GB SSD 120GB 3,381 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0311A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 29 33 21 4.4 37 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	8.28% Terrible	Read 95.8 Write 102 Mixed 142 SusWrite 21.8 20% 90.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.8 11% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 8.28% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT4G3D1869DT1TX0. 1x4GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 5.4 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 35%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 5350 APU R3AMDBench 34%, 3,720 samples	19x
Sempron 3850 APU R3AMDBench 29%, 134 samples	2x
Athlon 5150 APU R3AMDBench 32%, 453 samples	1x

SSD
Premier SP550 120GBAdata $45Bench 76%, 22,057 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
Q300 480GBToshiba $152Bench 80%, 5,920 samples	2x

RAM
9905403-173.A00LF 2x2GBUnknownBench 16%, 3 samples	2x
CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 11,058 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,140 samples	1x

Value: 10% - Very poor

Total price: $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16