| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus F1A55-M LX (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20111212 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 01 '17 at 14:57 |
| Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
| Run User | MDA-User |
| Background CPU | 42% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
34.5%
Below average
|
30% 42.9 Pts
|
14% 125 Pts
|
11% 183 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R7 250X
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.10.3
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
13% 18.5 fps
|
13% 15.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1230C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
33.3%
Below average
|
32% 144 MB/s
|
58% 18.1 MB/s
|
14% 24.3 MB/s
|
|
|
59.5%
Above average
|
76% 102 MB/s
|
125% 1.12 MB/s
| |
|
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
120GB free, PID 1019
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
40% 31.2 MB/s
|
82% 0.92 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend JM1600KLN-4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
28%
Poor
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
15% 5.37 GB/s
|
28% 143 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical F1A55-M LX Builds (Compare 22 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LX
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A6-3500 APUAMD $60Bench 39%, 2,804 samples | 5x |
| A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples | 5x |
| Athlon II X4 631AMDBench 46%, 1,364 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples | 2x |
| Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples | 2x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 42% - Average | Total price: $112 |