Average Bench: 11.6% (276th of 714)

Based on 12,863 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 683D Models: AMD Radeon R7 200, ASUS R7 250X

Terrible average bench

The AMD R7 250X averaged 88.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 14.5fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 12.4fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R7 250X is just 5%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R7 250X performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 17.4fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 22.1fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 12,863 samples)
Min Avg Max
10.3 Lighting 14.5 17.4
12 Reflection 17.4 20.9
16.8 Parallax 22.1 26.1
11.8% 18 fps
Min Avg Max
6.4 MRender 13.6 15.8
11.1 Gravity 16.1 19.6
9.8 Splatting 12.4 14.3
11.3% 14 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 25.5
14% 20.7 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 14.3
13% 16.6 fps
Gigabyte(1458 2282) 2GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 23
14% 19.4 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 12.7
12% 14.9 fps
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 22.7
12% 18.6 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 12.5
12% 14.4 fps
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 22.8
12% 18.6 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 12.5
12% 14.3 fps
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 22.5
12% 18.3 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 12.5
12% 14.2 fps
Asus(1043 300B) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1145 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 22.3
11% 18.2 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 12.5
11% 14 fps
XFX(1682 7266) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 667 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 20.1
9% 14.6 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 16
Splatting 9.8
9% 10.7 fps
XFX(1682 7266) 1GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 18
Parallax 16.6
8% 14.9 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 12
10% 12.3 fps
XFX(1682 7266) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 667 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 20.6
9% 14.5 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 9.7
9% 10.5 fps
12,863 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,464,633 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 12,863 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Sapphire(174B E214) 31% 12% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B A002) 17% 11% ± 2%
Asus(1043 300B) 13% 12% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 2282) 7% 12% ± 2%
XFX(1682 7266) 6% 9% ± 1%
MSI(1462 2715) 6% 12% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 7260) 5% 12% ± 0%
Asus(1043 3009) 5% 13% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2501) 5% 12% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B E252) 3% 9% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 2283) 2% 12% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical R7 250X Builds (Compare 24,256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325

Popular R7 250X systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent

24 months ago.

great card for the price, performs well in modern title as well as being better and cheaper than a gt 710


Terrible

4 years ago.

It's hard to say what exactly I dislike about the card. It just gave be a bad vibe from day 1 when it arrived as a replacement for my DOA 7770. It's performance has always felt poor, sure it runs more modern games at higher framerates than the intel HD graphics I had to compare it to, but it never felt like it was working very efficiently. It leaves horizontal lines on the screen reminiscent of VHS fuzz just in the desktop and I've even experienced the occasional black screen when waking up from sleep mode. I suspect mine is a 1GB model and that the 2GB model is more reliable, but the fact that the two aren't easily distinguishable is yet another reason to avoid buying it IMO. Overall I would strongly recommend *not* buying this card even in a pinch.


Your
opinion?
714 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback