Average Bench: 12.7% (194th of 639)

Based on 9,791 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 683D Models: AMD Radeon R7 200, ASUS R7 250X

Terrible average bench

The AMD R7 250X averaged 87.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 46.3fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 47.9fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R7 250X is just 5.67%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R7 250X performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 42.7fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 70.1fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 9,791 samples)
Min Avg Max
23.8 Lighting 46.3 58.7
32.2 Reflection 42.7 48.9
50.3 Parallax 70.1 81.7
12.2% 53 fps
Min Avg Max
13.3 MRender 28.4 32.4
33.3 Gravity 47.9 57.6
22.4 Splatting 42 48.5
12.8% 39.4 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Lighting 60.6
Reflection 49.7
Parallax 83.2
16% 64.5 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 58.7
Splatting 49
16% 46.9 fps
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 49.5
Parallax 82.8
16% 64 fps
MRender 32.8
Gravity 58.6
Splatting 48.9
16% 46.8 fps
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Lighting 58.1
Reflection 48.3
Parallax 88
15% 64.8 fps
MRender 32.1
Gravity 57.1
Splatting 47.7
15% 45.6 fps
Gigabyte(1458 2282) 2GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 55.2
Reflection 44.2
Parallax 73.5
14% 57.6 fps
MRender 30.2
Gravity 52.3
Splatting 43.4
14% 42 fps
Asus(1043 3009) 1GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1130 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 44.1
Parallax 70.5
14% 56.5 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 52.1
Splatting 43.5
14% 41.8 fps
Asus(1043 300B) 2GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Lighting 54.7
Reflection 44
Parallax 72.7
14% 57.1 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 43.4
14% 41.4 fps
Sapphire(174B A002) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 53.7
12% 45.4 fps
MRender 29.6
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 43.8
13% 40.6 fps
Sapphire(174B A002) 1GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Lighting 39.1
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 54.1
10% 45 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 34.3
Splatting 41.8
10% 34.9 fps
9,791 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 28,718,744 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 9,791 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Sapphire(174B E214) 28% 13% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B A002) 20% 12% ± 2%
Asus(1043 300B) 15% 13% ± 0%
XFX(1682 7266) 8% 12% ± 1%
MSI(1462 2715) 6% 13% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 2282) 6% 14% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 7260) 5% 13% ± 0%
Asus(1043 3009) 5% 13% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B E252) 3% 9% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 2283) 2% 13% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2501) 2% 13% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical R7 250X Builds (Compare 32,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $92

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $267

Popular R7 250X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

25 days ago.

I have one and oh god... I want to die


Terrible

6 months ago.

It's hard to say what exactly I dislike about the card. It just gave be a bad vibe from day 1 when it arrived as a replacement for my DOA 7770. It's performance has always felt poor, sure it runs more modern games at higher framerates than the intel HD graphics I had to compare it to, but it never felt like it was working very efficiently. It leaves horizontal lines on the screen reminiscent of VHS fuzz just in the desktop and I've even experienced the occasional black screen when waking up from sleep mode. I suspect mine is a 1GB model and that the 2GB model is more reliable, but the fact that the two aren't easily distinguishable is yet another reason to avoid buying it IMO. Overall I would strongly recommend *not* buying this card even in a pinch.


Your
opinion?
639 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $54
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback