Average Bench: 12.7% (197th of 643)

Based on 10,336 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 683D Models: AMD Radeon R7 200, ASUS R7 250X

Terrible average bench

The AMD R7 250X averaged 87.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 45.6fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 48.2fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD R7 250X is just 5.92%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD R7 250X performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 42.6fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 70.1fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 10,336 samples)
Min Avg Max
0.22 Lighting 45.6 59.3
31.8 Reflection 42.6 49.4
50.4 Parallax 70.1 82.3
12% 52.8 fps
Min Avg Max
13.2 MRender 28.2 32.7
33.3 Gravity 48.2 58.5
22.3 Splatting 42 48.7
12.8% 39.5 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Lighting 60
Reflection 50.1
Parallax 93.6
16% 67.9 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 58.9
Splatting 49
16% 47 fps
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 49.1
Parallax 80
16% 62.9 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 58.6
Splatting 48.7
16% 46.7 fps
Gigabyte(1458 2282) 2GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 44
Parallax 72.7
14% 57.2 fps
MRender 30.2
Gravity 52
Splatting 43.3
14% 41.8 fps
Asus(1043 300B) 2GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Lighting 50
Reflection 44.8
Parallax 73.3
13% 56 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 44.1
13% 40.9 fps
Asus(1043 300B) 2GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Lighting 50.4
Reflection 44.5
Parallax 73.3
13% 56.1 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 48.7
Splatting 43.9
13% 40.8 fps
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.8.1
Lighting 50.2
Reflection 43.7
Parallax 72.8
13% 55.6 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 43.2
13% 40.4 fps
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Lighting 50
Reflection 43.2
Parallax 71.3
13% 54.8 fps
MRender 29.2
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 43
13% 40.3 fps
Sapphire(174B E214) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Lighting 49.9
Reflection 43.8
Parallax 72.8
13% 55.5 fps
MRender 29.3
Gravity 45.9
Splatting 43.1
12% 39.4 fps
Sapphire(174B A002) 1GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 50.3
10% 42.6 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 41.4
9% 34.3 fps
10,336 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 33,417,843 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 10,336 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Sapphire(174B E214) 30% 14% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B A002) 23% 12% ± 2%
Asus(1043 300B) 12% 13% ± 0%
XFX(1682 7266) 11% 12% ± 1%
MSI(1462 2715) 5% 13% ± 0%
Asus(1043 3009) 4% 13% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 7260) 4% 13% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 2282) 4% 14% ± 0%
Sapphire(174B E252) 3% 9% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2501) 2% 13% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 2283) 2% 13% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical R7 250X Builds (Compare 4,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $171

Popular R7 250X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

2 months ago.

I have one and oh god... I want to die


Terrible

10 months ago.

It's hard to say what exactly I dislike about the card. It just gave be a bad vibe from day 1 when it arrived as a replacement for my DOA 7770. It's performance has always felt poor, sure it runs more modern games at higher framerates than the intel HD graphics I had to compare it to, but it never felt like it was working very efficiently. It leaves horizontal lines on the screen reminiscent of VHS fuzz just in the desktop and I've even experienced the occasional black screen when waking up from sleep mode. I suspect mine is a 1GB model and that the 2GB model is more reliable, but the fact that the two aren't easily distinguishable is yet another reason to avoid buying it IMO. Overall I would strongly recommend *not* buying this card even in a pinch.


Your
opinion?
643 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $189Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $299Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback