Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190918
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 04 '22 at 12:48
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X Eight-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 673
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 1001
62% 1001 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Gigabyte(1458 230F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.15021.11005
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 53.1
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 74.1
43% 61.9 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 43
43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V7 SSD 512GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 58 199 4.8 7.4 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 453
Write 378
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 65.3
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 28.8
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback