Asus P7P55D-E LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E LX  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 10 '14 at 09:58
Run Duration650 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 144
51% 112 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 242
32% 241 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 33% Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.104.0.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 18.7
18% 19.1 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 20
14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 351
Write 111
Mixed 137
43% 200 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 13
80% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 24.4
49% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 83%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
67GB free
Firmware: 1AA01112 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 89.7
Write 68.6
Mixed 79.5
60% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.36
101% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 62%
WDC WD30 EZRS-00J99B0 3TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 92
Write 72.9
Mixed 45.6
84% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.16
77% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 39%
WD Elements 2TB
1TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 21
Mixed 24.8
32% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.19
60% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 44%
WD My Book Essentials 2TB
783GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 21.6
Write 17.3
Mixed 9.97
19% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.33
82% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 22%
WD My Book 1TB
550GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 26.2
Mixed 22.4
33% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.26
68% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 22%
WD Elements 1.5TB
195GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 21.8
Write 17.8
Mixed 16.9
23% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.19
66% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 22%
WD Elements 2TB
47GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 22.5
Mixed 17.7
28% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.18
57% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 44%
Packard Bell Carbon 2TB
24GB free, PID 002d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
7.8% Terrible
Read 21
Write 16.3
Mixed 12.7
20% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 0.17
20% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.8%
Great: 19%
pqi IntelligentStick 16GB
10GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.79% Terrible
Read 23.4
Write 14.5
Mixed 13.8
20% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.89
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.43
34% 1.78 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.79%
Great: 10%
Typical P7P55D-E LX Builds (Compare 492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback