MSI X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '22 at 11:40
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 229
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 673
69% 558 Pts
64-Core 1,721
106% 1,721 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.9% Above average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 88.1
53% 72.1 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 73.8
Splatting 47.2
49% 61.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$50
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,461
Write 1,622
Mixed 1,383
402% 1,822 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 46.2
162% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 182
169% 268 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 311%
Samsung MZ7TE512HMHP-00004 512GB
270GB free
Firmware: EXT0300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 415 417 420 420 419 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 478
Write 414
Mixed 213
SusWrite 417
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 27
101% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 76.3
90% 157 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 151 152 152 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 152
Write 152
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 152
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
288% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 104%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00SPEB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 36.2
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 0.1
32% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
87% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 46%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
238GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 49.6
Write 37.7
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 0.9
37% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
66% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 51%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
340GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 7 6.5 7 6.6 7.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 252
Write 6.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 6.8
51% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
40% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.8% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 12.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $892
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback