Lenovo 20B7A1P700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20B7A1P700  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20B7A1P700
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '23 at 16:56
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Memory 17.9
1-Core 60
2-Core 107
32% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 77.6
8-Core 78.8
10% 78.2 Pts
64-Core 82.6
5% 82.6 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 3.5
2% 2.37 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 3
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VTP256GSSD1 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 141 199 203 235 182 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 350
Write 326
Mixed 274
SusWrite 195
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 4.6
31% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 12.3
43% 95 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 94%
Ct1000bx 50 1TB
209GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 146 202 201 218 182 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 288
Write 255
Mixed 254
SusWrite 194
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 11.2
46% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 57.7
DQ Write 81.8
DQ Mixed 32.4
35% 57.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron LX8GDDR3LS1600 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4.5
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 337
12% 337 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20B7A1P700 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20B7A1P700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback