HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 339A
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '23 at 03:44
Run Duration	372 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 83 1-Core 97.9 2-Core 178 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 450 47% 376 Pts	64-Core 446 28% 446 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% EVGA(3842 2713) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.14 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.5% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 4.4 3% 4.27 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 4 Splatting 5 4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.5% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microfrom 256GB SATA3 SSD 256GB 251 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0718B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 134 58 141 114 115 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 487 Write 415 Mixed 416 SusWrite 134 81% 363 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 70.3 4K Mixed 28.2 125% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 49.5 93% 182 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 94%
Seagate ST2000NM0011 2TB 582 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 587GB free Firmware: NS00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 103 106 107 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 109 Write 102 Mixed 65.4 SusWrite 106 70% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 86%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 95 96 95 97 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 80 Write 89.7 Mixed 64.4 SusWrite 94.3 61% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 55%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 123 124 120 126 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 146 Write 148 Mixed 85.4 SusWrite 122 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.9 289% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 140 148 140 149 147 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 152 Write 122 Mixed 32.9 SusWrite 142 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.8 220% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 87%
Seagate Desktop 8TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 720GB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.1 9.4 9.1 9.3 9.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 51.3 Write 29 Mixed 26.6 SusWrite 9.2 22% 29 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.9 273% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 93%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB 5,996 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 541GB free Firmware: 1707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9.3 9.2 9.3 9.3 9.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 50.6 Write 28 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 9.2 21% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.6 181% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 69%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.9 8.7 8.8 8.9 8.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 57 Write 24.5 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 8.7 33% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 63% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 22%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 2.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.9 8.9 8.8 8.8 8.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 56.3 Write 25.2 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 8.7 33% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.8 58% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 22%
ST350031 2CS 500GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 464GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 100 95 99 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 111 Write 110 Mixed 49.4 SusWrite 96.5 121% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 43%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 987GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 1.1 1.5 0.7 0.1 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	22% Poor	Read 102 Write 93 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 3.6 64% 55 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 59%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1.3 1.5 0.7 0.1 0.1 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Read 166 Write 155 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 0.9 102% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 106% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 59%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 100 95 99 97 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 117 Write 123 Mixed 19.1 SusWrite 96.3 115% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 38% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 59%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 3,994 Mixed 1.7 1,315% 1,998 MB/s	4K Read 110 4K Mixed 0 610% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 622GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 59 67 67 65 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 149 Write 72.5 Mixed 37 SusWrite 64.2 94% 80.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 56%
WDC WD80 EAZZ-00BKLB0 8TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.5 0.9 0.7 0 2.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.5% Below average	Read 121 Write 119 Mixed 75.6 SusWrite 0.9 99% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 1.2 188% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 32%
WDC WD80 EAZZ-00BKLB0 8TB 3.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.4 0 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.3% Below average	Read 120 Write 115 Mixed 79.1 SusWrite 4.2 100% 79.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1.1 176% 3.3 MB/s

SAMSUNG HD105SI 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 931GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 65 61 66 67 71 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.4% Average	Read 157 Write 31 Mixed 72.9 SusWrite 64.4 94% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 121% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 4x4GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	49.2% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.2 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 15.9 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	911x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	285x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	204x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	419x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	191x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	129x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	86x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	25x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	20x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	20x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16