Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160816
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 29 '17 at 01:43
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 154
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 464
45% 368 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8469) 3GB
CLim: 1363 MHz, MLim: 1535 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.6% Average
Lighting 52.5
Reflection 51.3
Parallax 55.8
43% 53.2 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 54.5
51% 63.6 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 377
Mixed 406
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 42.7
149% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 118
119% 195 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 100%
Great: 124%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
459GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 131
Write 94.8
Mixed 101
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.47
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 65%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
87GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 76.5
Write 71.6
Mixed 72.3
55% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.35
87% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 65%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ab36
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 31.7
Mixed 32.3
42% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.22
61% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 17.3
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 12.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback