Ciara Discover

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Destroyer	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	89.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Ciara Discover (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ77MK
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130226
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '23 at 03:53
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 97.7 2-Core 181 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 490 51% 408 Pts	64-Core 460 28% 460 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 8620) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89.1% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 130 Parallax 119 90% 120 fps	MRender 89 Gravity 121 Splatting 107 87% 106 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 101%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
D2CSTK251M3T-0240 240GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 91 84 115 77 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 362 Write 195 Mixed 222 SusWrite 94.3 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 45.2 4K Mixed 28.4 83% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 230 163% 210 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U7EFR8A-PB 4x4GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.8% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15.6 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 17.8 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	64	52	60	23.8"	1280 720	VSC303B VA2447-FHD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Discover Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Ciara Discover

CPU
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	98x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	15x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	42x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	40x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x

SSD
Premier SP550 240GBAdata $74Bench 79%, 29,295 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
CT102464BA160B.M16 2x8GBCrucialBench 54%, 2,915 samples	39x
CT102464BA160B.M16 1x8GBCrucialBench 30%, 2,735 samples	12x
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6J1 2x8GBMicronBench 53%, 77 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $186

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16