ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 3484JMU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	9.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Lenovo 3484JMU (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO
Memory	2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121221
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 20 '18 at 02:25
Run Duration	425 Seconds
Run User	DOM-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$192 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 99.9 2-Core 195 76% 129 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 472 54% 421 Pts	64-Core 472 29% 472 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	9.11% Terrible	Lighting 10.3 Reflection 9.42 Parallax 11.9 8% 10.5 fps	MRender 13.3 Gravity 12.1 Splatting 13.2 10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.11% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59 15,217 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 288GB free Firmware: PB3O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 140 140 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 4755 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 5059 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 4683 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 114 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 28179 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 214749347875 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	40.6% Average	Read 66.8 Write 74.6 Mixed 64.8 52% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.36 86% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 320GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 123716616 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 558 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 568908926 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 10255 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 511 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 68 42 73586573344 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 213 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2254 (C2) HDA temperature 32 58 90194313248 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -114160230717564 (F1) Unknown 100 253 17439376594 (F2) Unknown 100 253 90389672757	73.6% Very good	Read 159 Write 97.3 Mixed 119 94% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.24 92% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 88%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7 16,591 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 5GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	6.37% Terrible	Read 27.3 Write 5.23 Mixed 8.41 13% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.15 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.01 20% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.37% Great: 22%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 0GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	9.42% Terrible	Read 23.7 Write 5.86 Mixed 9.43 13% 13 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 1.03 93% 2.45 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.42% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown VS2GB1333D4 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.1% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.1 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 15.5 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback