| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H61M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 8 |
| BIOS Date | 20130702 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 01 '16 at 15:51 |
| Run Duration | 106 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 63% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
45.3%
Average
|
48% 75.9 Pts
|
16% 119 Pts
|
5% 78.7 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4052
|
1.11%
Terrible
|
1% 1.24 fps
|
2% 1.76 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
106% 141 MB/s
|
59% 0.64 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend JM1333KLH-4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
16.6%
Very poor
|
15% 5.27 GB/s
|
10% 3.6 GB/s
|
40% 99.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,325 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 332x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 266x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 188x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 441x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 147x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 112x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $227 |