Asrock B75M-GL

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B75M-GL (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120530
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 26 '18 at 14:10
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 103 2-Core 203 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 352 46% 348 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 02AC) 512MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.850.0.0 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	5.02% Terrible	Lighting 6.17 Reflection 9.12 Parallax 3.78 5% 6.35 fps	MRender 5.95 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 7.87 5% 5.91 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.02% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5662 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 520 (B1) Unknown 97 97 52 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 44 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10688127318	101% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 407 Mixed 276 88% 398 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 39.3 150% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 96.7 106% 179 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 735GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 169 169 2508 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 375 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2696 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 186 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 814 (C2) HDA temperature 113 108 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	89.4% Excellent	Read 156 Write 156 Mixed 109 104% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.16 4K Write 2.61 4K Mixed 0.34 135% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905402-475.A00LF 2x2GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 17.9 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75M-GL Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-GL

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	11x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	8x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	7x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	4x

SSD
Agility 3 120GBOCZ $102Bench 49%, 38,562 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 6,401 samples	4x
99U5474-013.A00LF 2x2GBKingstonBench 43%, 317 samples	3x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16