Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateMar 11 '18 at 21:24
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 132
55% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 381
39% 313 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB
CLim: 930 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.1.1
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 48.5
32% 38.6 fps
MRender 26.9
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 35
27% 32.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 136
Write 89.4
Mixed 77.2
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 7.85
65% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 82.1
DQ Mixed 9.92
19% 36.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
260GB free
Firmware: MS1OA800 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 176
Mixed 161
122% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.19
72% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 103%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50
238GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 85.7
Mixed 53.9
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.19
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 65%
Samsung SP0411C 40GB-$22
24GB free
Firmware: UU100-05 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 41.2
Write 50.2
Mixed 43.5
34% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.72
4K Mixed 0.28
62% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0. BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 12GB
800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.3% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback