Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 PRO (all builds)
Memory	58 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140725
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '18 at 21:13
Run Duration	382 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4930K-$90 22,204 User benchmarks, average bench 77% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 215 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 607 60% 493 Pts	64-Core 814 50% 814 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Asus(1043 8548) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 387.92 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 70% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 931GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 673 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 153 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 64 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7664100	97.7% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 408 Mixed 344 93% 421 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 68.6 4K Mixed 33.3 144% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 77.7 92% 161 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 226GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1770 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 472 (B1) Unknown 99 99 18 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 60 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 96 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13132329920	58.8% Above average	Read 370 Write 167 Mixed 226 56% 254 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 38.1 4K Mixed 26.4 93% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 54.7 56% 91.9 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 76GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2272 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 733 (B1) Unknown 98 98 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 57 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 304 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9437664973	50.7% Above average	Read 362 Write 116 Mixed 143 45% 207 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 18.1 82% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 59.5 DQ Mixed 40 46% 79.9 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 118%
Seagate ST4000VX000-1F4168 4TB 3,084 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 3.5TB free Firmware: CV13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 108479840 (03) Spinup time 93 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1293 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 57 54 17181814083 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1388 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 299 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 65 420806681 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 25 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1293 (C2) HDA temperature 25 40 73014444057 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	77.1% Very good	Read 133 Write 136 Mixed 131 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.21 77% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 106%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 174 6083 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1394 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2579 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 854 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 491 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 183 183 52126 (C2) HDA temperature 125 108 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	71.8% Very good	Read 134 Write 117 Mixed 90.7 85% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.2 80% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 83%
SDHC Card 32GB 13,791 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 27GB free, PID null Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	7.62% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 7.53 Mixed 16.7 18% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.62 4K Write 0.56 4K Mixed 0.52 54% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.62% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 8x8GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	84.5% Excellent	MC Read 35.8 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 30.3 93% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 14.3 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 53%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	543x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	385x
Core i7-4930KIntel $90Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	97x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	84x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	84x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	38x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	36x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	33x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	32x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GBKingstonBench 86%, 505 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $877

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16