Asus X550CC

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Asus X550CC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X550CC
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140324
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '16 at 08:10
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3537U 17,065 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 84.7 1-Core 85.2 2-Core 148 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 202 27% 200 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 124D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.57% Terrible	Lighting 3.77 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 2.94 3% 4.03 fps	MRender 5.29 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 8 4% 5.22 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.57% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 902 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 456 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 47 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 19 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8011458261	71.6% Very good	Read 505 Write 402 Mixed 416 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 16.3 84% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 26.6 DQ Write 62.9 DQ Mixed 16.1 20% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 124%
WDC WD32 00BPVT-80ZEST0 320GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 293GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34% Below average	Read 82.8 Write 81.7 Mixed 80.2 105% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.16 52% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 Kingston ASU16D3LS1KBG/4G 8GB 256 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	53.7% Above average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 17.2 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X550CC Builds (Compare 926 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X550CC

CPU
Core i5-3337UIntelBench 47%, 33,616 samples	316x
Core i7-3537UIntelBench 52%, 17,065 samples	264x
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	251x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	656x
GeForce GT 720MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,823 samples	208x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	50x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	46x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	23x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	21x

RAM
EBJ40UG8EFU0 1x4GBElpidaBench 29%, 3,036 samples	94x
MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 1x4GBMicronBench 29%, 1,972 samples	75x
MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GBMicronBench 41%, 542 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16