| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| Motherboard | Asus X99-E WS (all builds) |
| Memory | 60.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20160118 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 17 '16 at 08:21 |
| Run Duration | 599 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
82.2%
Excellent
|
81% 142 Pts
|
59% 444 Pts
|
28% 446 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 366E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6451
|
68.5%
Good
|
72% 83.8 fps
|
61% 75.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
107%
Outstanding
|
100% 448 MB/s
|
152% 52 MB/s
|
142% 250 MB/s
|
|
|
108%
Outstanding
|
100% 447 MB/s
|
156% 54.2 MB/s
|
142% 249 MB/s
|
|
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
101%
Outstanding
|
110% 38.5 GB/s
|
57% 19.8 GB/s
|
58% 69.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 42x |
| Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 35x |
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 15x |
| RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 15x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 15x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $1,158 |