Asus P7P55 LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7P55 LX  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110103
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 19 '18 at 00:14
Run Duration476 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 96.2
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 172
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 411
46% 359 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Asus(1043 82B2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.31
0% 0.76 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.83
1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 163
Write 149
Mixed 114
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 9.85
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 6.4
50% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 11.1
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 33.4
39% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
889GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 148
Write 158
Mixed 137
111% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.02
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.3
118% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 109%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 25
Mixed 26.3
34% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.23
68% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 55%
ST2000DL 001-9VT156 2TB
652GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 25.3
Mixed 27.1
35% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.21
22% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 35%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
357GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 27.3
Mixed 29.9
37% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.25
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14%
Great: 69%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
34GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 27.4
Mixed 14.1
29% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.17
37% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 69%
WDC WD10 EADS-65M2B0 1TB
6GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.9% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 27.3
Mixed 28.3
36% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.28
63% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 32%
ST1000DM 000-9TS15E 1TB
0GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.7% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 28.3
Mixed 29.6
38% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.52
63% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 12.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 53.4
75% 53.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55 LX Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55 LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback