Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '18 at 05:56
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 379
51% 382 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
PowerColor(148C 2385) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 33.4
22% 30 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 26
Splatting 34.3
25% 29.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 427
Write 115
Mixed 140
49% 228 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 17.2
84% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 50
64% 115 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
49GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 82.6
Write 79.5
Mixed 21.2
44% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.34
83% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
62GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 71.9
Write 70.6
Mixed 21.9
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.31
78% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
28GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 19.5
Mixed 26.3
33% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.71
4K Write 0.57
4K Mixed 0.44
56% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM44GU48N24-FFFHA0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 30.5
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 25.4
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 90%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $231
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback