Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD

Radeon RX 560-B

▲ 51186 ▼

Release date ≈ Q2 2017.

Average Bench: 19.7% (219th of 713)

more Based on 49,289 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 67EF Models: Radeon RX 560, AMD Radeon (TM) RX 560, Radeon(TM) RX 560 Graphics, AMD Radeon(TM) RX 560, Radeon (TM) RX 560, ASUS Radeon RX 560
Poor: 17%Average: 19.7% Great: 22%

Popular builds with this GPU

Terrible average bench

The AMD Radeon RX 560-B averaged 80.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 23.7fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 23fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Radeon RX 560-B is just 5.13%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 560-B performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 26.8fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 33.3fps

Average Bench

(Based on 49,289 samples)
Rank 21919.7%
Min Avg Max
18.8 Lighting 23.7 27.1
24.6 Reflection 26.8 28.4
27.7 Parallax 33.3 37.9
19.3% 27.9 fps
Min Avg Max
24 MRender 25.8 27.3
22.6 Gravity 27.1 30.3
20 Splatting 23 25.3
20.5% 25.3 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.9.1
20% Poor
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 34
19% 28.3 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 25.1
21% 26.2 fps
Asus(1043 054F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1187 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.9.1
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 27
Parallax 33.2
19% 27.9 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 27.1
Splatting 24.9
21% 25.8 fps
XFX(1682 956D) 2GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 27
Parallax 32.5
20% 28 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 20.6
19% 23.9 fps
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 33.4
19% 27.6 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 27.5
Splatting 20
20% 24.4 fps
Asus(1043 0561) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.21914.4000
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 33.6
19% 28.2 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 27.3
Splatting 21.7
20% 25 fps
Asus(1043 054F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1187 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 32.1
18% 27.1 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 21.4
20% 24.5 fps
Device(1642 1727) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1149 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.4.1
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.5
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 27.7
16% 24.7 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 20
19% 23.4 fps
PwrHis(1787 3000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
15% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 25
Parallax 25.5
13% 22.3 fps
MRender 24.1
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 22.1
18% 22.1 fps
49,289 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,763,753 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 49,289 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Hide stale prices
XFX(1682 956D) 29% 20% ± 1%
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) 13% 20% ± 1%
AMD(1002 0B04) 11% 19% ± 2%
PwrHis(1787 3000) 9% 19% ± 2%
Asus(1043 054F) 7% 20% ± 1%
PowerColor(148C 2385) 6% 20% ± 2%
Dell(1028 1703) 4% 18% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 230A) 4% 21% ± 1%
Asus(1043 054B) 4% 19% ± 1%
ASRock(1849 5001) 4% 19% ± 1%
Device(1642 1727) 2% 18% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 A56D) 2% 21% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0561) 1% 20% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 2300) 1% 21% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0549) 1% 20% ± 1%
Asus(1043 054D) 1% 20% ± 0%
ASRock(1849 5039) 1% 17% ± 1%
Elitegroup(1019 0036) 1% 20% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0563) 0% 19% ± 0%
Device(1642 1643) 0% 18% ± 0%
Acer(1025 125D) 0% 19% ± 0%
HP(103C 8479) 0% 21% ± 0%
HP(103C 87CF) 0% 20% ± 0%
ASRock(1849 5040) 0% 16% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 39C2) 0% 22% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Radeon RX 560-B Builds (Compare 6,253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $120Bench 73%, 179,588 samples910x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD  $60Bench 63%, 104,122 samples740x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $90Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples571x
GPU
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples1x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples209x
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples163x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples158x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples138x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples131x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples118x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $185

Popular Radeon RX 560-B compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
10,040

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

1 month ago.

GBR-User
Avatar level
5,906

Good

4 years ago.

Normal people dont post comments or "reviews", why would they? Only company plebs trying to sell sh** do that. Took me a few stings to figure it out. Gotta give the AMD "fanboys" 10/10 for hard work, they are all over it - HOOYA

FRA-User
Avatar level
4,675

Good

2 years ago.

My friend bought the same pc has I did, except it was the nvidia + intel and his was not only the same price but about 3x better, this graphic card can't run anything.

LTU-User
Avatar level
2,360

Excellent

4 years ago.

Very good SSD, Witcher 3 60fps with medium graphics,kaes gou 300fps eta zajybys, Leageu of Legends 100fps stabilno, i can barely say its better than 1080+. With best Greetings, Anton Zajebon

ThatGuyRandomly
Avatar level
12

Average

3 years ago.

100% a budget card don't think otherwise. Facebook marketplace they're about 50-90 bucks, cheaper then a GT 1030 and perform better, smothers a gt 1010 which offers the same level of 3 outputs. Personally the XFX I grabbed is very good to OC. I managed to jump mine from the regular 20.4% to 26.5%. Not a substantial increase (think about going from crap to mud, same color different smell) but a bump of generally 10-15 frames on all my games. Was able to run Cyberpunk 2077 at the lowest settings and 720p windowed with 40 fps while OC. If you want a work station that doesn't do video stuff and only older gaming perfectly fine. Because at the end of the day while it may be a budget and a half card for gamers, this card is meant for workstations who don't do any video rendering or anything. 3 monitor outputs vs 2 on the gt 1030, twice the TDP of the gt 1030, however lower wattage is possible with a downclock, and I've never had stability issues at standard settings. It's reliable and perfect for someone who is watching the market all day or wants their stock investments on one screen while they do other things on the two other monitors. Any sort of gaming should really come second to it's utility outputs. Nobody would make the argument that a gt 1030 should be good at gaming or built for it, and this is the same case.

fireburnin207
Avatar level
2

Terrible

5 years ago.

Crashes when i start my pc sometimes, and performance is abysmal.

AsBr0nCs
Avatar level
2

Terrible

4 years ago.

The gpu in itself is pretty good, if you don't want to have a good time. It has a hard time rendering decently quality videos. When playing video games, you run 60-75fps on average, if you're lucky maybe somewhere in the 100s. Games really can't be put on semi-good quality settings, because it can't handle it very well. Overall, not a very good gpu, especially for the price.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 7 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia RTX 4060
vs Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 4070
vs Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
vs Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 3070
vs Nvidia RTX 3060
vs Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 3080

713 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback