Average Bench: 19.7% (219th of 715)

more Based on 49,289 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 67EF Models: Radeon RX 560, AMD Radeon (TM) RX 560, Radeon(TM) RX 560 Graphics, AMD Radeon(TM) RX 560, Radeon (TM) RX 560, ASUS Radeon RX 560

Terrible average bench

The AMD Radeon RX 560-B averaged 80.3% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 23.7fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 23fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Radeon RX 560-B is just 5.13%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 560-B performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 26.8fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 33.3fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 49,289 samples)
Min Avg Max
18.8 Lighting 23.7 27.1
24.6 Reflection 26.8 28.4
27.7 Parallax 33.3 37.9
19.3% 27.9 fps
Min Avg Max
24 MRender 25.8 27.3
22.6 Gravity 27.1 30.3
20 Splatting 23 25.3
20.5% 25.3 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
XFX(1682 956D) 2GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 35.9
21% 29.7 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 25.2
22% 26.9 fps
Gigabyte(1458 230A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1189 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 38.8
20% 30.4 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 28.4
Splatting 20
20% 24.9 fps
PwrHis(1787 3000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Lighting 24
Reflection 39.7
Parallax 30.8
20% 31.5 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 28.4
Splatting 24.1
21% 26.1 fps
XFX(1682 956D) 2GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 32.2
19% 27.8 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 27.3
Splatting 20
20% 24.6 fps
PwrHis(1787 3000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 30.8
18% 26.5 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 24.4
20% 25.2 fps
PwrHis(1787 3000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 31.2
16% 26.1 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 25
Splatting 24.7
20% 25.1 fps
ASRock(1849 5039) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 27.8
16% 23.8 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 22
Splatting 22.4
19% 23.1 fps
XFX(1682 956D) 2GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 17.8
9% 15.9 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 16.9
12% 13.7 fps
49,289 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,675,365 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 49,289 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
XFX(1682 956D) 29% 20% ± 1%
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) 13% 20% ± 1%
AMD(1002 0B04) 11% 19% ± 2%
PwrHis(1787 3000) 9% 19% ± 2%
Asus(1043 054F) 7% 20% ± 1%
PowerColor(148C 2385) 6% 20% ± 2%
Dell(1028 1703) 4% 18% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 230A) 4% 21% ± 1%
Asus(1043 054B) 4% 19% ± 1%
ASRock(1849 5001) 4% 19% ± 1%
Device(1642 1727) 2% 18% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 A56D) 2% 21% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0561) 1% 20% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 2300) 1% 21% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0549) 1% 20% ± 1%
Asus(1043 054D) 1% 20% ± 0%
ASRock(1849 5039) 1% 17% ± 1%
Elitegroup(1019 0036) 1% 20% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0563) 0% 19% ± 0%
Device(1642 1643) 0% 18% ± 0%
Acer(1025 125D) 0% 19% ± 0%
HP(103C 8479) 0% 21% ± 0%
HP(103C 87CF) 0% 20% ± 0%
ASRock(1849 5040) 0% 16% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 39C2) 0% 22% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Radeon RX 560-B Builds (Compare 6,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $218

Popular Radeon RX 560-B compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good

4 years ago.

Normal people dont post comments or "reviews", why would they? Only company plebs trying to sell sh** do that. Took me a few stings to figure it out. Gotta give the AMD "fanboys" 10/10 for hard work, they are all over it - HOOYA


Good

2 years ago.

My friend bought the same pc has I did, except it was the nvidia + intel and his was not only the same price but about 3x better, this graphic card can't run anything.


Excellent

4 years ago.

Very good SSD, Witcher 3 60fps with medium graphics,kaes gou 300fps eta zajybys, Leageu of Legends 100fps stabilno, i can barely say its better than 1080+. With best Greetings, Anton Zajebon


Average

3 years ago.

100% a budget card don't think otherwise. Facebook marketplace they're about 50-90 bucks, cheaper then a GT 1030 and perform better, smothers a gt 1010 which offers the same level of 3 outputs. Personally the XFX I grabbed is very good to OC. I managed to jump mine from the regular 20.4% to 26.5%. Not a substantial increase (think about going from crap to mud, same color different smell) but a bump of generally 10-15 frames on all my games. Was able to run Cyberpunk 2077 at the lowest settings and 720p windowed with 40 fps while OC. If you want a work station that doesn't do video stuff and only older gaming perfectly fine. Because at the end of the day while it may be a budget and a half card for gamers, this card is meant for workstations who don't do any video rendering or anything. 3 monitor outputs vs 2 on the gt 1030, twice the TDP of the gt 1030, however lower wattage is possible with a downclock, and I've never had stability issues at standard settings. It's reliable and perfect for someone who is watching the market all day or wants their stock investments on one screen while they do other things on the two other monitors. Any sort of gaming should really come second to it's utility outputs. Nobody would make the argument that a gt 1030 should be good at gaming or built for it, and this is the same case.


Terrible

5 years ago.

Crashes when i start my pc sometimes, and performance is abysmal.


Terrible

3 years ago.

The gpu in itself is pretty good, if you don't want to have a good time. It has a hard time rendering decently quality videos. When playing video games, you run 60-75fps on average, if you're lucky maybe somewhere in the 100s. Games really can't be put on semi-good quality settings, because it can't handle it very well. Overall, not a very good gpu, especially for the price.


Your
opinion?
715 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback