TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD

Radeon RX 560-B

▲ 51116 ▼

Release date ≈ Q2 2017.

Average Bench: 20.5% (159th of 652)

more Based on 31,585 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 67EF Models: Radeon RX 560, AMD Radeon (TM) RX 560, Radeon(TM) RX 560 Graphics, AMD Radeon(TM) RX 560, Radeon (TM) RX 560, ASUS Radeon RX 560
Poor: 17%Average: 20.5% Great: 23%

Popular builds with this GPU

Very poor average bench

The AMD Radeon RX 560-B averaged 79.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 24.5fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 26.3fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Radeon RX 560-B is just 6.35%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 560-B performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 27.3fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 33.7fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 31,585 samples)
Rank 15920.5%
Min Avg Max
19.1 Lighting 24.5 28.5
23.9 Reflection 27.3 30.4
27.3 Parallax 33.7 38.8
19.8% 28.5 fps
Min Avg Max
24.5 MRender 26.1 27.9
21.8 Gravity 26.3 30.4
19.9 Splatting 21.9 25.6
21.2% 24.8 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1299 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.1.1
21.6% Poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 38.3
20% 30.9 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 25.5
24% 28.2 fps
XFX(1682 956D) 2GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.1.1
21.6% Poor
Lighting 26.1
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 35.9
21% 29.9 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 27.6
Splatting 25.1
22% 26.3 fps
XFX(1682 956D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
20.8% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 33.7
20% 28.7 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 26.7
Splatting 20.6
21% 24.5 fps
PowerColor(148C 2385) 2GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.12.1
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 29.9
17% 26 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 24.5
19% 24.7 fps
31,585 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 38,722,655 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 31,585 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Hide stale prices
XFX(1682 956D) 30% 21% ± 2%
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) 17% 21% ± 2%
PwrHis(1787 3000) 9% 19% ± 2%
Asus(1043 054F) 8% 20% ± 1%
PowerColor(148C 2385) 6% 20% ± 2%
AMD(1002 0B04) 5% 19% ± 2%
Dell(1028 1703) 5% 18% ± 1%
Asus(1043 054B) 4% 20% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 230A) 3% 22% ± 2%
Device(1642 1727) 2% 19% ± 1%
PwrHis(1787 A56D) 2% 21% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0561) 2% 20% ± 1%
ASRock(1849 5001) 2% 19% ± 1%
Elitegroup(1019 0036) 2% 21% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0563) 1% 20% ± 0%
ASRock(1849 5039) 1% 17% ± 1%
Asus(1043 054D) 1% 20% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 2300) 1% 21% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0549) 0% 20% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 39C2) 0% 22% ± 1%
Device(1642 1643) 0% 18% ± 0%
PwrHis(1787 2385) 0% 16% ± 0%
Acer(1025 125D) 0% 23% ± 0%
Device(7333 0000) 0% 19% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3801) 0% 23% ± 0%
Legend(17AA 3803) 0% 19% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Radeon RX 560-B Builds (Compare 14,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $186Bench 77%, 541,476 samples2,422x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD  $99Bench 71%, 59,405 samples2,149x
Ryzen 3 2300X Quad-CoreAMDBench 72%, 6,974 samples1,223x
GPU
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 31,585 samples1x
SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $37Bench 46%, 107,382 samples561x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 67%, 266,434 samples457x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 66%, 29,621 samples382x
RAM
DDR4 3000 1x8GBAdataBench 48%, 8,633 samples387x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 83%, 38,330 samples303x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 1x8GBUnknownBench 46%, 4,066 samples273x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $223

Popular Radeon RX 560-B compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
7,400

Disliked (edit your comment) Add link

12 days ago.

GBR-User
Avatar level
4,642

Good

8 months ago.

Normal people dont post comments or "reviews", why would they? Only company plebs trying to sell sh** do that. Took me a few stings to figure it out. Gotta give the AMD "fanboys" 10/10 for hard work, they are all over it - HOOYA

AUS-User
Avatar level
3,066

Poor

18 months ago.

RX560 4 gb brought new crashed my asus board htpc consistently, replaced with a 2nd hand windforce gtx950 2gbwhich is faster and doesn't fail. The RX 560 also failed a Z210, the card's finally working in a pre built asus essentio cm6730 with a i5 3570. would never buy amd again.

LTU-User
Avatar level
1,792

Excellent

11 months ago.

Very good SSD, Witcher 3 60fps with medium graphics,kaes gou 300fps eta zajybys, Leageu of Legends 100fps stabilno, i can barely say its better than 1080+. With best Greetings, Anton Zajebon

ThatGuyRandomly
Avatar level
6

Good

17 days ago.

100% a budget card don't think otherwise. Facebook marketplace they're about 50-90 bucks, cheaper then a GT 1030 and perform better. Personally the XFX I grabbed is very good to OC. I managed to jump mine from the regular 20.4% to 26.5%. Not a substantial increase (think about going from crap to mud, same color different smell) but a bump of generally 10-50 frames on all my games. Was able to run Cyberpunk 2077 at the lowest settings and 720p windowed with 40 fps while OC. If you want a work station that doesn't do video stuff and only older gaming perfectly fine.

fireburnin207
Avatar level
2

Terrible

2 years ago.

Crashes when i start my pc sometimes, and performance is abysmal.

AsBr0nCs
Avatar level
2

Terrible

6 months ago.

The gpu in itself is pretty good, if you don't want to have a good time. It has a hard time rendering decently quality videos. When playing video games, you run 60-75fps on average, if you're lucky maybe somewhere in the 100s. Games really can't be put on semi-good quality settings, because it can't handle it very well. Overall, not a very good gpu, especially for the price.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 3 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 3070
vs Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 3080
vs Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 2060
vs Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)
vs AMD RX 5600-XT

652 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback