Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '18 at 13:56
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 105 2-Core 212 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 777 72% 603 Pts	64-Core 1,132 70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Lighting 41.7 Reflection 32.7 Parallax 38.9 34% 37.8 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 37.9 31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 96 76 81 72 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 258 Mixed 313 SusWrite 95.5 63% 286 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 48.1 169% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 278 213% 292 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 124%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 164 161 164 166 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Read 151 Write 158 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 163 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 113GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 64 63 63 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 60.3 Write 39 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 63.6 39% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 46GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 166 166 165 167 166 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	80% Very good	Read 114 Write 82.7 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 165 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 866GB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 182 182 183 181 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 116 Write 114 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 181 79% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 0.6 244% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 87%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB 13,353 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 110 110 111 113 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 49.5 Write 61.2 Mixed 54.2 SusWrite 110 51% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.5 151% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D30AEEA.K16FE 2x8GB 1,650 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	100% Outstanding	MC Read 39.7 MC Write 34 MC Mixed 35.4 104% 36.4 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 38.2 SC Mixed 29.9 87% 30.6 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)