Today's hottest deals

HP p6625fr

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6625fr  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AA9
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100907
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 09 '18 at 14:39
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 635
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 41.5
2-Core 84.2
42% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 156
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 23.9
26% 29.4 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 29.3
26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320813AS 320GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SD23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 56 66 26 57 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 51
Write 78.3
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 57.6
40% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 65%
Seagate ST3250823AS 250GB-$99
100GB free
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 56 55 58 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 57.2
Write 51.7
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 56.4
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR1870EF48E8W1333 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.9% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback