Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 0000 3 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	82.4% Excellent	Memory 91.6 1-Core 123 2-Core 234 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 646 64% 520 Pts	64-Core 647 40% 647 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL 1,607 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Intel(8086 2073) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1011 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: Q1 2018 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22.4% Poor	Lighting 23.2 Reflection 42.7 Parallax 30.5 19% 32.2 fps	MRender 40.1 Gravity 21 Splatting 42.8 29% 34.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 30%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green SATA M.2 120GB-$47 6,576 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 231 Write 181 Mixed 176 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 13.2 77% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 75.4 DQ Mixed 16.3 32% 66.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.C8FBR1 1x8GB 160 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	42.6% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 11.3 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.2 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16