Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 0000 3 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	84.9% Excellent	Memory 91.9 1-Core 120 2-Core 238 85% 150 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 636 65% 528 Pts	64-Core 655 41% 655 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 372A) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Lighting 45.2 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 37.3 37% 37.6 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 41.1 Splatting 33.3 30% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green SATA M.2 120GB-$47 6,576 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 253 Write 156 Mixed 18 31% 142 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 94.1 4K Mixed 23 115% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 20.3 61% 130 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.C8FBR1 1x8GB 160 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 11.2 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.6 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16