bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1176 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20140414
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateAug 02 '18 at 09:37
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5520
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 111
47% 77.4 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 347
34% 280 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 118GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 8.3 10 9.5 9.5 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.92% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 10.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 9.6
10% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 8.92%
Great: 82%
Vmware Virtual disk 113GB
93GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 23 17 19 17 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.78% Terrible
Read 12.7
Write 7.5
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 17.9
9% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.78%
Great: 74%
Amazon Storage Gateway 6.5TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 5.8 5 7.2 9.9 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.38% Terrible
Read 1
Write 0.8
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 7.3
2% 2.65 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.03 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 64 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 17.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback