PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell OptiPlex 990 |
Motherboard | Dell OptiPlex 990 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130924 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 02 '18 at 13:39 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | MYS-User |
Background CPU | 52% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
62.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Patriot Burst 240GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 127 136 132 128 130 MB/s
|
54.8%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
930GB free
Firmware: JC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 122 125 124 122 MB/s
|
69.3%
Good
|
|||
Seagate FreeAgent Go 320GB
27GB free, PID 2100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 25 26 MB/s
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 1,652x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 1,265x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 690x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 766x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 324x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 304x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $216 |