PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus B85M-E (all builds) |
Memory | 6.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141119 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 09 '18 at 04:37 |
Run Duration | 235 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 30% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
53.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
79GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 152 152 151 152 152 MB/s
|
69.7%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
557GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 93 81 83 86 95 MB/s
|
48.8%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT325U6CFR8C-PB Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096 MB
|
38.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 397x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 322x |
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 258x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 326x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 200x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 175x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $343 |