Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	90.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '18 at 21:08
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 94.7 1-Core 154 2-Core 217 91% 155 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 205 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 121 Parallax 103 94% 113 fps	MRender 99.9 Gravity 105 Splatting 107 85% 104 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,172 Write 1,469 Mixed 577 308% 1406 MB/s	4K Read 45.4 4K Write 176 4K Mixed 61.6 241% 94.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,163 DQ Write 1,034 DQ Mixed 871 715% 1,023 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 20GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 7,384 Write 7,139 Mixed 6,915 1,597% 7,146 MB/s	4K Read 385 4K Write 214 4K Mixed 278 1,053% 292 MB/s	DQ Read 1,537 DQ Write 1,153 DQ Mixed 1,191 932% 1,294 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung HD103SI 120GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 20GB free Firmware: 1.3.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 125 119 120 123 140 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	82.7% Excellent	Read 416 Write 145 Mixed 204 SusWrite 126 49% 223 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 42.3 166% 62.7 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 164 124% 166 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3111 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 39.8 MC Mixed 31 97% 34 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 35.6 SC Mixed 26.9 78% 27.5 GB/s	Latency 58 69% 58 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1,000x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	94x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	253x
GTX 1080Nvidia $265Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	50x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	41x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $1,128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16