Asrock X58 Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock X58 Extreme  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110425
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '16 at 06:28
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 127
60% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 413
40% 332 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
PNY(196E 1000) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5560
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 30.8
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 37.5
25% 33.1 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 29
Splatting 26.4
25% 31.9 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.2% Above average
Read 269
Write 239
Mixed 252
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 5.8
82% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 5.77
35% 80.2 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 74%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB
594GB free
Firmware: 0K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 103
Write 92.1
Mixed 89
71% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 0.46
125% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 73%
Siimage Volume B 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0000
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 56.1
Write 17
Mixed 26.6
25% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 0.26
4K Mixed 0.33
75% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21%
Great: 29%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
545GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 61.1
Write 76
Mixed 73.1
53% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.26
70% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.8% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 10.5
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Extreme Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock X58 Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $207
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback