Asus P8Z77-V LK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LK  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121023
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 15 '14 at 15:41
Run Duration603 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
69% 153 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 386
51% 385 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 50% Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.301.1001.0
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 41.5
29% 36.5 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
342GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 111
Write 92.5
Mixed 89.8
74% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.46
110% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
207GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 86
Write 66.2
Mixed 80.2
58% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.28
85% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 94.6
Mixed 94.1
72% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.34
86% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 65%
Kingston DataTraveler 111 USB 3.0 16GB-$23
10GB free, PID 1693
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Read 33.4
Write 4.92
Mixed 7.3
14% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.37
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.08
26% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 15%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
4GB free, PID a20b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 10.7
Mixed 9.44
20% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.62
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.006
32% 2.88 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 10%
Verbatim Store 'n' Go 2GB
2GB free, PID 2005
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
6.44% Terrible
Read 25.1
Write 6.42
Mixed 1.79
10% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.73
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.008
22% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.44%
Great: 6%
Typical P8Z77-V LK Builds (Compare 2,196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LK - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback