Nvidia AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 5% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	NVIDIA AWRDACPI
Motherboard	Nvidia AWRDACPI (all builds)
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20041122
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '18 at 13:43
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 4000+ 13 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 939, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.58% Terrible	Memory 15.5 1-Core 18.1 2-Core 18.2 11% 17.3 Pts	4-Core 21.9 8-Core 22.3 3% 22.1 Pts	64-Core 30.4 2% 30.4 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 9.58% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6800 LE 4 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Device(0000 0000) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.8 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 0.65 Parallax 0.16 1% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD3200SD-01KNB0 320GB 169 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 232GB free (System drive) Firmware: 08.05J08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 32 26 7.1 4.8 8.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 47 Write 32.9 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 17.6 25% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 36%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB 6,669 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.9 2.9 3 3.1 3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	2.19% Terrible	Read 9.3 Write 2.5 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 3 6% 4.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.19% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	4.71% Terrible	MC Read 1.7 MC Write 1.3 MC Mixed 1.6 4% 1.53 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1 SC Mixed 0.7 2% 0.87 GB/s	Latency 356 11% 356 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.71% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AWRDACPI Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: Nvidia AWRDACPI

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+AMD $50Bench 34%, 2,970 samples	1x
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+AMD $84Bench 34%, 2,640 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $50

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Nvidia AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Nvidia AWRDACPI

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)