Asus P7F-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7F-M  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101202
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 07 '18 at 18:17
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3450
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 127
60% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 325
34% 270 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 19.7
18% 19.5 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 229 231 241 240 240 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 507
Write 157
Mixed 196
SusWrite 233
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 10.8
58% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 20.8
68% 145 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 133%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC-WRSN 500GB
332GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 183 184 186 186 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55% Above average
Read 241
Write 230
Mixed 184
SusWrite 184
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 24.8
81% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 189
145% 197 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 55%
Great: 106%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB
444GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 110 111 112 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 107
Write 103
Mixed 43
SusWrite 111
66% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 63%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
149GB free
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 58
Write 55.7
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 57.8
39% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.2% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 11.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7F-M Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7F-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $255
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback