Today's hottest deals

Average Bench: 1.72% (568th of 713)

Based on 62,458 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 104A Model: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610

Terrible average bench

The Nvidia GeForce GT 610 averaged 98.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 2.07fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 1.97fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GeForce GT 610 is just 0.44%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GeForce GT 610 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 2.23fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 0.57fps

Average Bench

(Based on 62,458 samples)
Min Avg Max
1.8 Lighting 2.07 2.4
1.2 Reflection 2.23 3.4
0.3 Parallax 0.57 0.9
1.7% 1.62 fps
Min Avg Max
2 MRender 2.37 2.8
2.1 Gravity 2.28 2.4
1.7 Splatting 1.97 2.1
1.77% 2.21 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Nvidia(10DE 2211) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.73 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.6
2% 2.8 fps
Asus(1043 8496) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 3
Splatting 2
2% 2.5 fps
Asus(1043 83FB) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 0.7
2% 2.53 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.43 fps
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.5 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 1.8
2% 2.03 fps
Asus(1043 847B) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.9
2% 1.83 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2
2% 2.23 fps
Nvidia(10DE 104A) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 0.9
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.17 fps
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.73 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2
2% 2.23 fps
Nvidia(10DE 0915) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.1 fps
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.4 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 1.8
2% 2.03 fps
62,458 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,447,299 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 62,458 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 15% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8496) 10% 2% ± 0%
MSI(1462 809F) 8% 2% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 6222) 7% 2% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 098E) 6% 2% ± 0%
Palit(1569 104A) 4% 2% ± 0%
PNY(196E 104A) 4% 2% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2619) 4% 2% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3623) 4% 2% ± 0%
Device(0000 0000) 4% 2% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2615) 3% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 847B) 3% 2% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 0915) 3% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 840D) 2% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8460) 2% 2% ± 0%
Gainward(10B0 104A) 2% 2% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3545) 2% 2% ± 0%
Device(7377 0000) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8411) 1% 2% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 5222) 1% 2% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3611) 1% 2% ± 0%
Nvidia(10DE 104A) 1% 2% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 36D6) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8417) 1% 2% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 5215) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 847C) 1% 2% ± 0%
MSI(1462 2636) 1% 2% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3546) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83FB) 1% 2% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2616) 1% 2% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3549) 1% 2% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 3648) 1% 2% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 5214) 1% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 83FC) 0% 2% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2617) 0% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8452) 0% 2% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 362A) 0% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8408) 0% 2% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8534) 0% 2% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 2219) 0% 2% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 1214) 0% 2% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 3619) 0% 2% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 2613) 0% 2% ± 0%
XFX(1682 249B) 0% 2% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GeForce GT 610 Builds (Compare 24,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322

Popular GeForce GT 610 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

7 days ago.

uhhh pretty old and cant run cs anymore :(


Terrible

7 months ago.

directx 11 but in gta 5 15fps :/


Good

17 months ago.

Its ok if you dont plan using it for heavy tasks


Excellent

2 months ago.

tenho essa placa rodo cs com td no minimo no 4:3 com uma media de 40 fps. Se vc quer uma placa pra jogos e n for mt exigente pegue uma gtx 750 it da china ou o q preferir mas essa placa eh soh pra dar dor de cabeça.


Good

2 months ago.

better than "power saving" hd 5500


Poor

19 months ago.

Perfect price & performance for my budget


Terrible

23 months ago.

if you want to play a ps2 emulator natively this card is good otherwise is very bad


Terrible

5 months ago.

My calculator has better performance in visual tasks


Terrible

18 months ago.

Its playable on most of games, better that intel HD Graphics 2000


Terrible

4 years ago.

Can barely even handle roblox lmao


Terrible

4 years ago.

Horrible, even athlon 200ge integrated graphics are better than this


Poor

3 years ago.

Useless for anything slightly intensive. Better used as a frisbee. The only use is for a budget pc with no integrated.


Your
opinion?
713 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback