Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 112% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '18 at 21:27
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 66.9 1-Core 114 2-Core 239 75% 140 Pts	4-Core 455 8-Core 920 81% 688 Pts	64-Core 2,379 147% 2,379 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6393) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 141 Reflection 196 Parallax 195 115% 177 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 170 Splatting 128 115% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 225 237 218 215 219 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 428 Write 314 Mixed 216 SusWrite 218 66% 294 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 82 4K Mixed 23.6 105% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 168 142% 203 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 98%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 173GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 660 858 897 895 910 910 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 138 141 137 142 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Read 137 Write 100 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 140 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 585GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 118 120 120 112 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 54.5 Write 106 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 117 64% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.5 206% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBD 4x16GB 271 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	135% Outstanding	MC Read 54.3 MC Write 53 MC Mixed 53.5 153% 53.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 34.7 SC Mixed 21.7 68% 24 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 135% Great: 135%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 121%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	20x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	16x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 105%, 6,151 samples	17x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	17x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 109%, 1,628 samples	8x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $836

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16