Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory15.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateAug 29 '22 at 09:07
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 68.4
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 149
59% 102 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 448
45% 367 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.8% Very good
Lighting 91.9
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 84.8
75% 89.2 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 87.2
Splatting 74.1
69% 85.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 128GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001c01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,009
Write 552
Mixed 366
141% 642 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 12.3
110% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 214
150% 186 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 197%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$36
79GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 133 165 160 152 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 157
Write 176
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 154
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$85
36GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 93 94 91 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 48.9
Write 73.5
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 91.8
50% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
62% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G KHX2400C15/16G 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
60.2% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 21.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback