HP ProLiant ML150 Gen9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP ProLiant ML150 Gen9  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory61.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '18 at 05:14
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 36
2-Core 75.6
38% 58.7 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 283
26% 217 Pts
64-Core 282
17% 282 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 9.5 9.8 9.3 10 9.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 164
Write 5.3
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 9
34% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 752368-081 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.7% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 32.7
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML150 Gen9 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: HP ProLiant ML150 Gen9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $185
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback