HP hp workstation xw6200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP hp workstation xw6200  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 08B8h
Memory1.9 GB free of 4.00049 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20041210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '18 at 02:38
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.40GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 49.2
32% 45.7 Pts
4-Core 68.4
8-Core 73.9
9% 71.2 Pts
64-Core 76
5% 76 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7790
Asus(1043 0452) 1GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.5.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 35.4
21% 30.3 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 33.1
24% 28.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 45 48 50 51 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 46.9
Write 48.8
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 47.1
33% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 33280 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.94% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 2.8
7% 2.57 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.94%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical hp workstation xw6200 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP hp workstation xw6200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback