HP hp workstation xw8200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP hp workstation xw8200  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 08B4h
Memory9.8 GB free of 12.001 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '18 at 19:23
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.40GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25% Poor
Memory 43.2
1-Core 25.3
2-Core 35.4
24% 34.6 Pts
4-Core 41.3
8-Core 42.7
6% 42 Pts
64-Core 51.8
3% 51.8 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB-$136
783GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LC11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 83.2
Write 83.5
Mixed 30.6
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 0.31
4K Mixed 0.18
35% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24
143GB free
Firmware: 3.43 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 55.4
Write 56.2
Mixed 14.8
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.38
89% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 32%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 22.6
Write 6.7
Mixed 9.94
14% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.39
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 1.19
109% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 45GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
5.27% Terrible
MC Read 1.7
MC Write 1
MC Mixed 1.6
4% 1.43 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1
SC Mixed 0.9
3% 0.93 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 5.27%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical hp workstation xw8200 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP hp workstation xw8200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback