MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A20
MotherboardMSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20)  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '18 at 04:09
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$190
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 268
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 882
86% 708 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4998) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.7
16% 20.6 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 26
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 132 154 143 120 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 224
Write 192
Mixed 219
SusWrite 141
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 40.9
156% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 115
96% 140 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
162GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 315 315 317 316 316 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 492
Mixed 458
SusWrite 337
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 62.1
212% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 353
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
593GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 104 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 79.8
Write 74.5
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 105
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
176GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 83 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 122
Write 116
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 83.6
67% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 137 138 141 142 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 169
Write 144
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 140
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 55.7
MC Mixed 40.8
133% 46.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 23
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 51.2
78% 51.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 121%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) Builds (Compare 797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A20) - $223

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $664
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback