PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P7P55D-E PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20101214 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 29 '18 at 02:09 |
Run Duration | 189 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
|
58.2%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 161 160 166 164 166 MB/s
|
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
412GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 70 72 74 73 MB/s
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 70 72 74 73 MB/s
|
69.1%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 122 120 123 127 125 MB/s
|
52.7%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
890GB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 55 56 57 57 MB/s
|
34.7%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500G 500GB
236GB free, PID 1351
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 55 58 57 57 MB/s
|
116%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
42.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 80x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 76x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 75x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 25x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 22x |
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $407 |