bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory14.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '16 at 21:47
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 166
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 321
44% 325 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 67%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 366
Write 327
Mixed 239
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 8.64
4K Mixed 1.89
31% 8.86 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 9.87
DQ Mixed 5.77
29% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 69%
Vmware Virtual disk 75GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 509
Write 299
Mixed 380
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 28
104% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 116
136% 236 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 64 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 43.4
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 16.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback