| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-E (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180326 |
| Uptime | 2 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 08 '18 at 19:40 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.1%
Very good
|
71% 120 Pts
|
46% 345 Pts
|
21% 343 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
19% 20.6 fps
|
18% 22.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 202 211 219 206 223 MB/s
|
82.4%
Excellent
|
61% 272 MB/s
|
139% 52.4 MB/s
|
141% 220 MB/s
|
|
|
48.4%
Average
|
50% 69.1 MB/s
|
66% 0.43 MB/s
| |
|
Iomega E xternal HD 1TB
664GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
|
18.3%
Very poor
|
43% 31.7 MB/s
|
84% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ramaxel RM51264BA1339.16FR 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
53.4%
Above average
|
53% 18.5 GB/s
|
44% 15.3 GB/s
|
60% 66.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,815 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 222x |
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 175x |
| Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples | 143x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 208x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 108x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 100x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $548 |